Why Students (and Adults) Struggle to Be Wrong — and How to Help

The beginning of my career had me teaching high school Science, Chemistry and Math. One of my fondest memories was organizing science fairs at two different schools. The science fair was a great way for my students to expand both their knowledge in an area of interest, as well as give them practical experience in the scientific method.

Here’s an example of a typical conversation I might have had:

Two Grade 9 students set out to test whether plants grow better when exposed to music. They were excited, confident, and — after two weeks — convinced they were right. The plants exposed to music looked ‘happier’, they told me.

But when I gently pointed out that the control group had actually grown taller, they hesitated. “Maybe the music plants are just slower starters.”

The students aren’t being dishonest. They are being human — exhibiting something called Confirmation Bias.

Confirmation Bias: Our brain’s tendency to seek out, interpret and remember information that supports what we already believe.

It’s why a student who thinks they’re ‘bad at math’ might ignore a good test score one day, or why a child convinced their teacher or another student doesn’t like them may interpret neutral feedback from others as criticism.

It’s not a character flaw. It’s a feature of cognition — especially in an adolescent brain.

The Brain’s Shortcut System

Our brains are wired for efficiency. Every second, we’re bombarded with sensory input, and to make sense of it all, the brain relies on heuristics — mental shortcuts that help us make quick decisions. Daniel Kahneman, Nobel laureate and author of Thinking, Fast and Slow, describes this as the interplay between “System 1” (fast, intuitive thinking) and “System 2” (slow, analytical thinking). Confirmation Bias lives in System 1 — it’s fast, automatic, and invisible.

This heuristic shortcut helps us feel safe and certain. Confirmation Bias allows us to make sense of something very quickly. But, in a learning environment, it can unfortunately also close the doors to a more complete understanding.

The Adolescent Brain and Belief Formation

Children and adolescents are especially vulnerable to Confirmation Bias. Their prefrontal cortex — the part of the brain responsible for critical thinking and self-regulation — is still developing well into their twenties. Research shows that the adolescent brain is particularly sensitive to social feedback. Beliefs formed during adolescence can become deeply entrenched and difficult to unseat — hence, the problem of changing “I can’t do math” or “Susie doesn’t like me”.

In school, this means that early experiences — both positive and negative — shape how students see themselves as learners for years to come.

When Confirmation Bias Meets the Curriculum

Confirmation Bias doesn’t just affect how students see themselves. It influences how they engage with content. A student who believes that History is ‘boring’ may skim over content that is actually really engaging. Someone who thinks that science is‘ too hard’ might dismiss their own curiosity on the topic. This same idea applies to every subject area depending on what a student believes — they can’t do math, sing, dribble a basketball, or bake a cake.

And when students are asked to explore controversial or difficult topics — things like climate change, historical injustices, or ethical dilemmas — Confirmation Bias can make it harder to consider multiple perspectives. This can close the door to exploring deeper, more complete truths.

Teachers as Cognitive Coaches

Educators play a powerful role in shaping how students process information. The way we frame questions, give feedback, and design lessons can either reinforce or disrupt Confirmation Bias.

When students actually believe their abilities can grow, they’re more likely to embrace challenges and revise their thinking. But this requires intentionality on the part of teachers, parents and others who work with them. A well-meaning comment that they’ve done a ‘good job‘ can actually reinforce a fixed belief just as easily as it can encourage growth.

Disrupting Confirmation Bias

So how do we help students see beyond what they already believe?

  • Ask open-ended questions — Invite multiple interpretations of the same issue or event.
  • Encourage metacognition — Have students reflect on how they’re thinking, not just what they’re thinking.
  • Introduce disconfirming evidence — What would it take to change their mind?
  • Model intellectual humility — Share moments when you’ve changed your own thinking.

Technology and Media

In today’s world, Confirmation Bias doesn’t stop at the classroom. In a previous post (Implicit Bias: Yup, I’m Talking About You! – Feb 2022) I discussed how social media (e.g. Instagram, TikTok, X, Facebook) is designed to confirm our bias by showing us posts and reels that agree with us — in direct contradiction to what we hope to be doing in classrooms. For young minds still forming their worldviews, this can reinforce narrow thinking as they settle into the belief that they must be right because “I see it everywhere on social media.

In Saanich Schools, teaching digital literacy — how to evaluate sources, question algorithms, and seek diverse perspectives is something we put a lot of effort into and will continue to do so.

A New Kind of Resilience

Helping students challenge their own beliefs isn’t about changing their views on being right. It’s about building cognitive resilience — the ability to sit with uncertainty, to revise one’s thinking, and to grow — to be confident enough in oneself to be open to other perspectives and, yes, to maybe being wrong.

And, let’s be clear, it’s not just students. Many adults also have a difficulty being wrong.

It’s why we see slow change on things that are destructive or hurtful — we know better, but we still carry on. Think of things like climate change, growing income disparity, intolerance towards others, stereotyping, and bigotry.

All of them wrong, yet they persist.

Building cognitive resilience is not just learning — it’s transformation. It’s building reflective, curious young people who are open to new ideas that can solve existing and future problems.

Teaching for Curiosity, Not Certainty

Education isn’t about filling students with facts. We have come past the point of thinking the goal of K-12 education is simply placing more facts and figures into their heads — yes, there are important lessons from history, science, math, reading, and physical literacy — however, education is about teaching students HOW to think, HOW to question, and HOW to stay curious — HOW to be open to conflicting information that should challenge one’s current understanding.

It’s about them being confident enough in themselves to be unsure.

Confirmation Bias is a natural part of being human. But when we help students recognize it, name it, and work through it, we give them a gift far greater than facts and certainty.

We give them the tools to keep learning.

(This post was written with assistance of an AI prompt on exploring confirmation bias in education. I changed much of the content and added significantly to the final product.)

Disruptive Technology

An innovation that significantly alters the way that consumers or systems like K-12 education operate. Disruptive technologies sweep away the processes they replace because they have attributes that are significantly superior.

We live in a world where changes are the norm — and they are happening at a pace that is often mind-boggling.

Some changes are thrust upon us:

  • Inflation / Consumer Price Index changes
  • New Taxes
  • Daylight Savings Time
When a Pumpkin Spice Latte was all the rage

… while other changes may be optional:

  • EVs (Electric vehicles)
  • Seasonal coffee flavours at Starbucks (still have to try the pumpkin spice latte)
  • New slip-on shoes without shoelaces (these seem like a great new idea, but are they cool?)

When its technology we’re talking about, change typically occurs because the new tech is faster, more user friendly or perhaps even cheaper:

  • LIGHT BULBS … replaced candles
  • AUTOMOBILES … replaced the horse & buggy
  • CALCULATORS … replaced the slide rule
  • The INTERNET … replaced encyclopedias

In all of these cases the technology change was DISRUPTIVE — the new tech replacing, or disrupting, the existing technology. Transition to the new tech was slow and somewhat predictable over time.

Today, there is a new disruptive tech that is sweeping the planet — and it has been an overnight sensation. Hundreds of millions of users ‘signed on’ in just a couple of months. It has both captivated the world and at the same time created a bit of fear with its insurgence.

Welcome to ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.

(More on Page 2)

“Why Don’t You Tweet (X?) More, Dave?”

A communication platform needs to be informative, timely and respectful.

Back in 2017 I thought I found one with Twitter.

I started using it in early 2017 determined to make it a significant part of my communication toolbox — a new way of connecting with others in my community on topics of interest in a way that I had not used. I wanted something that was instantaneous, as well as something where respectful dialogue could take place. Platforms such as the nightly news and periodicals provided one-way information flow. Twitter was poised to be my new two-way communication tool.

I was excited and up for the challenge.

I started out pretty strong too, but faded in my use of it over the first year. Today, in 2024, I still use Twitter …. I mean “X” … but do so sparingly. What I’ve found is that what is often presented on it as ‘fact’ is often just unsubstantiated opinion filled with negative and demeaning commentary.

That is not what I want or need from a professional communication tool.

It used to be a wonderful place to share thoughts and build understanding. And while there is still some of that within it, it is often punctuated with insults, accusations, political rhetoric and hyperbole.

I have pretty much lost interest in it as a reliable, professional communication tool.

(More on Page 2)